All content of this blog is my own opinion only. It does not represent the views of any organisation or association I may work for, or be associated with. Nothing within this blog should be considered as medical advice and you should always consult your Doctor.

The Omeprazole (Prilosec/Losec) Epidemic & Infant Reflux - Risks & Benefits

Many infant feeding practitioners have observed an exponential increase in the number of babies diagnosed with reflux and given hypoallergenic formula/and or reflux medication.  It's something I've blogged about before.

We have a situation whereby some babies are suffering with severe digestive issues, yet mums feel their concerns are not taken seriously (and I say mums intentionally, as many comment their concerns are taken more seriously should they take baby's dad with them or if he takes them).  In contrast others simply presented at A&E with an infant crying, were diagnosed immediately with "reflux" and given a host of medications and milks.

Today thought I'd specifically like to explore Omeprazole. 

I've heard parents feel confident Omeprazole makes a huge difference to their babies, whilst others feel there is little to no change at all; or maybe some improvement but still symptomatic enough to be seeking further help.

It isn't without risk of side effects, therefore it's surely key to ensure that the medication is needed, effective and ultimately providing more benefit than risk - this decision will be unique to each baby and situation.

Omeprazole belongs to a class of drugs called "proton pump inhibitors" or PPI's.  Unlike say ranitidine which aims to neutralise the acid, omeprazole actively works to reduce it being produced in the first place.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) & PPIs:
1.3 Pharmacological treatment of GORD
Consider a 4-week trial of a PPI or H2RA for those who are unable to tell you about their symptoms (for example, infants and young children, and those with a neurodisability associated with expressive communication difficulties) who have overt regurgitation with 1 or more of the following:
  • unexplained feeding difficulties (for example, refusing feeds, gagging or choking)
  • distressed behaviour
  • faltering growth.
1.3.4 Assess the response to the 4-week trial of the PPI or H2RA, and consider referral to a specialist for possible endoscopy if the symptoms: 
  • do not resolve or
  • recur after stopping the treatment. 
I decided to give NICE a tweet to ask for the studies that formed this guidance, and in the meantime scoured journals for studies.  I'll list them in date order, oldest first:

Next we have a teeny tiny study from 1993 of just 15 children ranging from 8 months - 17 years:
"Mildly elevated transaminase values in 7 patients and elevated fasting gastrin levels in 11 patients were present; in 6 of the 11, gastrin levels were 3 to 5.5 times the upper limit of normal."
"We found omeprazole to be highly effective in this group of patients with severe esophagitis [insert: irritation or inflammation of the oesophagus].  Omeprazole appears to be safe for short-term use, but further studies are needed to assess long-term safety because the significance of chronically elevated gastrin levels in children is unknown."
So in short, it worked to soothe an irritated or inflamed oesophagus, however it resulted in high gastrin levels, the impact of which is unknown and as such needs further investigation.  Gastrin is a hormone that is produced by ‘G’ cells in the lining of the stomach and upper small intestine; dring a meal, gastrin stimulates the stomach to release gastric acid. It also however acts as a disinfectant and kills most of the bacteria that enter the stomach with food.

I then decided to directly search for safety studies. The first thing I pulled up was a site called Choosing Wisely is an initiative of the ABIM Foundation, which was created by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) in 1989 with a mission "to advance the core values of medical professionalism as a force to improve the quality of health care."

Their goal via Choosing Wisely,  is "advancing a national dialogue on avoiding wasteful or unnecessary medical tests, treatments and procedures".  They provide evidence based information and are supported by over 70 partners including the American Academy of Paediatrics and The American Academy of Family Physicians

One of their publications is entitled:

Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question

This was released in 2013, still stating a lack of effectiveness and lack of exploration of potential adverse effects.

NICE then kindly tweeted back telling me I could find the supporting evidence here. So off I went:
Under A.3.3 Analysis it says: " The literature search found no trials evaluate the effectiveness of PPIs in children and therefore there is not sufficient evidence to include these treatments in an economic model." 
A.3.4 Resource use and costs: "No studies were identified that looked at the comparative cost effectiveness of medical therapy for GORD in children, either comparing different drug regimens or comparing medical management with surgical management. The comparative evidence of efficacy is poor.
A.3.5 Conclusion: " Therefore, no comparison of the cost effectiveness of medical management and surgical management was possible for this guideline".
I then ran through the studies listed under "I.8 Effectiveness of medical management (H2RAs, PPIs and prokinetics) in GOR or GORD", picking out those that examined omeprazole and infants.

The first I found on the list was the study quoted in the purple box above, concluding irritability was not improved.

The second study they list is the study quoted in the pink box above, concluding safety had yet to be addressed.

I then got excited when I found a new study I hadn't yet found.
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Esomeprazole for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Neonatal Patients, AAP 2013
The similarities between omeprazole and esomeprazole outweigh the dissimilarities.  Some claim esomeprazole is even more effective, although this doesn't appear to be supported by evidence.


The second paragraph is particularly interesting "the signs and symptoms traditionally attributed to acidic reflux were not significantly improved by esomperazole"

And does well tolerated mean no potential long-term adverse effects?

I scanned the rest of the papers and couldn't find any others relating to omeprazole and infants under 12 months.

So we have it seems, very little evidence demonstrating omeprazole is effectively resolving the symptoms parents seek help for, even if acid levels are reduced in a lab.

What about undesirable side effects?

If we look at the bigger picture than just babies, a paper entitled "Outcomes of a medicationoptimisation review inpatients taking proton pumpinhibitors" for the QUIPP (Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention) agenda reads:
"Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most commonly prescribed groups of drugs.1–4 Although PPIs are generally well tolerated, long-term use has been associated with adverse effects such as increased risk of bone fracture, 5–8 nutrient deficiency,9–11 Clostridium difficile infection, 12–15 and pneumonia.16–18 Because of these risks, the lowest effective dose of PPI should be used.19-21"
"Proton pump inhibitors may trigger the very symptoms that they are designed to treat because of compensatory mechanisms.23,24 Studies have shown that patients can suffer from rebound gastric acid hypersecretion following PPI withdrawal,25–27 which may make it difficult to maintain step down/off.28 In our experience, many healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients are unaware of the risk of rebound symptoms and how best to manage them"
In particular problems observed include magnesium deficiency and B12 deficiency.  Furthermore these studies are of adults, with increased risks to the elderly - what about babies?

In 2013 a study linked PPIs to constriction of blood vessels. 
"We found that PPIs interfere with the ability of blood vessels to relax," said Ghebremariam, a Houston Methodist molecular biologist. "PPIs have this adverse effect by reducing the ability of human blood vessels to generate nitric oxide. Nitric oxide generated by the lining of the vessel is known to relax, and to protect, arteries and veins."
There is concern ""If taken regularly, PPIs could lead to a variety of cardiovascular problems over time, including hypertension and a weakened heart.  In the paper, the scientists call for a broad, large-scale study to determine whether PPIs are dangerous." 

I asked Dr. Flanders, a paediatrician in Canada for his thoughts about young infants:

He also suggested we check out an article from Canadian Family Physician 2013:

So what does all this mean?

It seems clear that PPIs should not be widely prescribed for most babies.

Omeprazole appears well tolerated in the short term, but guidance suggests this is reviewed and reduced/removed ASAP to minimise potential side effects. If tests demonstrate babies are at risk from acid damage or have an inflamed oesophagus, omeprazole appears in the short term to be effective.

It means we also have a huge overlap of symptoms and so we need to be extremely thorough in assessments - because it's also clear from studies that many babies we think have "acid reflux", don't improve with medication that tests show is effectively working.

For example the NCT state:
"If your baby shows discomfort when feeding, such as arching away, refusing to feed and crying, it can be a sign of reflux. She may also frequently vomit or spit up (more than normal posseting, which is only about a teaspoon) and cough a lot, including at night, with no other sign of a cold.
Other symptoms include:
  • Waking often at night
  • Comfort feeding to help alleviate pain
  • Weight loss or poor weight gain
  • Excessive crying or irritability during or after feeding
  • Regurgitation"
Yet a baby with a feeding problem such as difficulty latching or using a teat well will arch, refuse to feed and cry.  They will often vomit if they gulp down air and can develop symptoms of reflux as a result.

 They may feed little and often appearing to "comfort feed" as a result and may struggle with poor weight gain too.  Babies generally not transferring enough milk also wake often at night.

A shallow latch can also cause aspiration (Catherine Genna Watson, Sucking Skills) and thus a persistent cough and so none of the symptoms are exclusive to reflux.

Tesco baby club have an almost identical list, as do Babycentre - it's hardly surprising parents are visiting doctors in their droves.

The problem is, we risk losing the babies suffering GORD, those who are most at risk of significant complications from their reflux, in all the noise of misdiagnosis. 

The babies who can suffer "An apparent life-threatening event" (ALTE), breathing difficulties, or experience damage to their oesophagus, experience recurrent aspiration pneumonias, persistent coughs and have a constant hoarse voice and acidic breath. 

NICE guidance clearly states infants should have their feeding fully assessed before any medications are prescribed, yet we know this isn't happening.  Parents please push to see if someone can identify why your baby is refluxing, or why it's to such a degree they need medicating - rather than just symptom shooting.

When The Breastfeeding Baby Keeps Falling Asleep Before They're Full

AKA "The Power nap"

We all know it's totally normal for breastfeeding babies to fall asleep when they've finished their dinner.  We know that in the first few days after birth it's also not unusual for baby to "forget" what they're were doing and take a quick snooze mid-feed, particularly if they're a little jaundiced or have had a more tiring delivery.

But what about when baby is consistently falling asleep before they're full?

It tends to go like this - baby drinks the first milk ejection or letdown, a nice suck/swallow ratio can be seen and this tends to be the part of the feed everyone watches.

As this naturally slows down, instead of pausing and then starting to drink with a regular swallow pattern again - baby adds more and more sucks for each swallow, becoming slower and slower until they're asleep. 

Except they're not. 

If you try and move them they will suddenly spring back into action.  Eyes open, hand comes back to mouth - rooting ensues.  Baby was taking a power-nap whilst waiting for more milk, they were not ready to leave the restaurant thank you very much.

I hear lots of solutions to resolve this.  Strip the baby down, blow on them, use a cold wet cloth to rouse them (yikes!), change a nappy.  Much doesn't tend to work for long though and so it goes like this:

mum blows on baby
baby takes three sucks
baby goes back to sleep
mum blows on baby
baby sucks a few more times
baby goes back to sleep
mum blows on baby
baby ignores blowing
mum blows AND tickles hands
baby suck a few more times
baby falls back asleep
mum undoes baby grow a bit, blows and tickles hands
and so on and so forth

It's probably easier to ask the question - why is the typical term, healthy baby persistently falling asleep before they're full?

A big reason babies fall asleep at the breast or bottle, is when the flow (for whatever reason) becomes too slow to be worth staying awake for.  Lots of sucking without swallowing lots of milk, isn't a sensible idea for a small human with limited energy supplies - they want bang for their buck.

We know this as if we take a "power-napper" and increase milk flow, baby's eyes spring open!  Oh we're back in action?  Nice one, I'll wake up then...

WATCH THIS CLIP - when additional milk is given, we can see the shutters ping open.

Of course, in a symptom solving society the answer seems obvious - increase milk flow, breast compress and switch feed.  Indeed short-term this can help, particularly for the sleepy newborn or baby who is a little early/small and simply running out of energy too soon.

A common reason for many "breast hangers" is a shallower than optimal latch, resulting in reduced milk transfer.  

I had an interesting discussion last week over on "Occupy Breastfeeding".  This was the stunning image posted.  Mum looks radiant but oh my days look at that teeny latch.

I love seeing breastfeeding in all sorts of positions and attachments, I'm not for a second suggesting we only show "optimal" images - this mum has clearly overcome a difficult time getting baby latched and feeding well and the resulting photo is glorious.  

I do though think we have to acknowledge when a latch is shallow - because we seem to have a nation of people who can't recognise the difference or who believe it doesn't matter and I don't think it's really helping anyone.  If we saw a heap of well attached babies, the odd shallow latch wouldn't need a mention - but we see so few breastfeeding images and we've lost so many skills around feeding...

Perhaps this baby had just fallen asleep at the end of a lovely feed and slipped shallow as mum moved to take the pic?  Who knows, it doesn't really matter as long as we can acknowledge that whilst it's a stunning picture, that latch as we see it won't work for many.

To some a shallow latch won't be a huge deal, particularly in the early days.  Some can compensate well,  especially when demands are small and milk supply is abundant.  Some mums are happy to feed half hourly day and night as baby gets older, or hold them upright or sling-wear to compensate for the colic, wind or reflux.  We're re-framing this as "normal", but for some mums, tapas style eating around the clock isn't always sustainable.  Some will experience mastitis from the regularly ineffective breast drainage, whilst for others the tiny mouth causes problems for baby if not for mum.  From reducing the transfer, to gulping air a myriad of symptoms can follow.  

I'll take it as a compliment to be accused of "being very big on latch" (I'm still not entirely sure whether the pun was intended, but I chuckled anyway).  I think we underestimate mothers to suggest they're going to stop breastfeeding en-mass because whilst they believed until now everything was completely fine, someone pointing out it doesn't quite look like a textbook may prompt them to abandon the breast and reach for the bottle.  If whatever your doing is working for you and your baby, run with it!   

I propose though,  mums are more likely to stop breastfeeding when despite telling everyone they have some concerns, they're pacified that it's just a (never ending) growth spurt, or their baby is fine with a teeny tiny mouth and perhaps she just has insufficient glandular tissue or baby has an allergy?

The Global Beastfeeding project has uploaded some great clips, including exploring why latch matters for many.  Here is a still from their clip showing a deep latch versus shallow latch or "nipple hanging".

In action this means we can't see the corners of baby's mouth:

The problem I think is the myth that refuses to die.  The pain myth.  How often do we hear the two key questions?  
  • Are you in pain?
  • Is your baby gaining weight? 
As though these are the only markers of effective feeding.

***Newsflash:  Babies can have an incredibly shallow latch and not cause pain.***

These babies will typically have slower gain, and/or feed super frequently or for long periods to compensate. Not all though, sometimes mum has so much milk, baby is full after drinking the milk that pours out with the first milk ejection (lactose rich milk) resulting in typical or above average gain.

In order to cause damage a baby has to to:
a) Have enough of something in their mouth to damage it
b) Be doing a compensatory action that causes damage.  Whether that's pushing the nipple up to the hard roof of their mouth, pinching and trapping it, rubbing their tongue against it or sucking extra hard like a vacuum cleaner.  

Sometimes a baby's suck is so disorganised they don't generate enough suction to cause pain to anything - it's weak and ineffective, like a sock in a washing machine.  These babies may also have initial early latching problems and trouble staying on the breast (lack of effective suction).  Sometimes mum is show positions to try and compensate for this which gets baby on, but not necessarily transferring milk as well as they could.

All of this also fails to recognise that the very mechanics of breastfeeding, mean that even if a baby doesn't latch "optimally", the act of suckling (creating a seal and rippling the tongue) - will assist in shifting them in to a deeper latch.

Normalising the weeny latch as "fine" doesn't really I suspect help many beyond the early weeks - we need to up our game in terms of breastfeeding education to help parents recognise when their baby is latched and drinking well, versus hanging out eating tapas style.